Last night, I had some free time and naturally I began thinking. I decided that the whole setup of the United States is very confusing and unneccessarily convaluted and complicated. It was then that I concluded that what really needs to be done to save this union is to redefine our antiquated state lines and replace them with boundries more in-tune with the regional definitions that we use as modern Americans.
So unveiled here for the first time ever is my comprehensive state redefinition plan.

I feel like I need to explain some aspects of my plan. Given are the state names in bold, with the capitals in parenthesis.
1. New England (Boston): It seems pretty clear to me that New England has a singular identity and should not be separated into six states. It just does not make sense. I should, however, point out that I took southern Connecticut and gave it to the Tri-State Area.
2. Tri-State Area (New York City): For anyone who has been to New York City, it is evident that the separation of New York and New Jersey is nothing more than a hinderence to functional metropolitan planning. So I separated the southeast tip from New York, the northern region from New Jersey and the southern portion of Connecticut and formed a much more sensicle unit, the Tri-State Area.
3. Philadelphia (Philadelphia): Southern New Jersey has as little cohesence with the northern section of the state as Philadelphia has with the western part of its state. So I combined those two regions and made a new state.
4. Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh): What was the idea of making Harrisburg the capital anyway?
5. New York (Albany): I understand that there may be confusion between New York and the Tri-State Area, (capital: New York City), but I don’t care much.
6. Maralware (Washington): Maybe the capital of our country would work better if it had more than 500,000 urban residents making the local decisions.
7. Virginia (Richmond): It is time to forget Civil War era hatreds and borders and finally reunite the Virginias.
8. Carolina (Charlotte): I spoke with a woman from North Carolina yesterday and she suggested that the state move its capital to Charlotte. I agreed, and threw in South Carolina just to get rid of all this North-South nonsense.
9. Georgida (Atlanta): Okay, I just really liked the name I came up with.
10. Alasippi (Birmingham): It only made sense to me to combine this two Gulf-Coastal states, and I even gave them some of the Florida pan-handle.
11. Miami (Miami): I should even go a step further and make southern Florida into its own country.
12. Kenasee (Nashville): As far as I am concerned, there is virtually no difference between those two states. So I combined them.
13. Ohio (Cleveland): Basically the same as regular Ohio, except I moved the capital to the much more sensible Cleveland.
14. Indanois (Chicago): This is perhaps the state combination with which I struggled most. But in the end, I decided that since I sometimes confuse the two states, I should just combine them. It’s selfish, I know.
15. Michigan (Detroit): Is current-day Michigan without that other stupid peninsula which is clearly a part of Wisconsin.
This is my summary of the east. I might cover the west tomorrow, but then again that’s only if I feel like it.
Also, I am looking for suggestions on what to rename the territory formerly known as Arkansas (a blatant ripoff of “Kansas.”) I always thought that was a stupid name.
Leave your thoughts!